5/30/2013

Vatican: Pope Francis Is Wrong; Atheists Will Still Burn In Hell


Published on May 26, 2013

Rev. Thomas Rosica, a Vatican spokesman
The Vatican has just announced that, despite what Pope Francis said in his homily earlier this week, atheists are still going to hell.

What a relief. For a brief moment there it was possible to imagine a brave new world of compassion, generosity and acceptance, not qualities we have come to associate with the Holy See.

Said Pope Francis this week: 'The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! 'Father, the atheists?' Even the atheists. Everyone!'

That seemed like a pretty clear admission that people of other faiths and none have intrinsic worth to God and will be saved alongside the faithful. But this turned out to be wishful thinking.

Although they are otherwise good, moral people they are still doomed to burn in a lake of fire for having the temerity to have been born outside of Catholicism and having chosen to remain so.

The Rev. Thomas Rosica, a Vatican spokesman, spelled it out for the world on Thursday. People who know about the Catholic church 'cannot be saved' if they 'refuse to enter her or remain in her,' he said.

So that's one tall order of eternal hellfire for the rest of us, then.

It makes for an interesting spectacle to see the infallible pope being corrected by his handlers, doesn't it? For a moment it was possible to recall the welcoming and indulgent style of the short lived Pope John Paul I in the unexpectedly all-embracing words of Pope Francis. But you'll recall how quickly John Paul I was replaced by the much more doctrinaire John Paul II.

There's no question that Pope Francis sees the divinity in all human beings, but that's a message that comes with caveats. God may make them all, Jew and Gentile, but unless their Catholic they're ultimately kindling. The Vatican waited 24 hours to correct him, but they corrected him.

Yes, yes, the Council of Trent clearly taught that Jesus Christ, humanity's one and only Redeemer, redeemed both Jew and Gentile. But there is a huge difference between redemption and salvation. See how that works? Judas Iscariot was redeemed by Christ's death on the cross, but he was not saved - Catholics believe he is damned in hell.

To be justified requires faith - and that faith must be Catholic. You see where this is going?

If I was Pope Francis, I'd be employing a food tester right about now.


Vatican Confirms Atheists Still Going To Hell, Despite Pope Francis Remarks
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/27/vatican-confirms-atheists-still-going-to-hell_n_3341368.html


The Vatican has clarified that atheists will still go to hell if they reject God, after Pope Francis broke with tradition to deliver a homily stating non-believers who do good will be redeemed through Jesus.
The Pope's words made headlines around the world after he gave an unprepared speech in which he emphasised the importance of “doing good” as a principle which unites all humanity.
After international media attention, the Vatican attempted clarify how exactly one gets in to heaven, with Rev. Thomas Rosica, a Vatican spokesman, saying that people who know about the Catholic church “cannot be saved” if they “refuse to enter her or remain in her.”
That is, atheists are still going to hell.
However there was still hope for the sinful among us, as “every man or woman, whatever their situation, can be saved. Even non-Christians can respond to this saving action of the Spirit. No person is excluded from salvation simply because of so-called original sin.”

L. Ray Smith
exposing those who contradict
lake.gif (2344 bytes)

1.The Book of Revelation is a Book of Symbols9.The Lucifer Hoax and the Mission of Satan
2.The Origin of Satan, Evil, and Sin10.The Synagogue of Satan - There's One Near You
3.Judgment by Fire Must Begin at the House of God11.The Depth of Satan - Who is Antipas?
4.Seeing and Understanding the Invisible12.God Judges the World in a Pond
5.A Scriptural Explanation of the Lake of Fire13.Who is the Beast? - 666?
6.The Two Judgments by FIRE14.The Beast Within
7.Church Heresy Came Long Before Bible Errors15.The Myth of "Free Will" Exposed - Part AThe Myth of "Free Will" Exposed - Part B
The Myth of "Free Will" Exposed - Part C
The Myth of "Free Will" Exposed - Part D
8.What Happened to the Church Jesus Built?16.A.  Hell: Sheol Translated Grave
B.  Hell: Sheol Translated Hell
C.  Hell: The Origin of Endless Punishment
D1 Hell: The Christian hell is a Christian HOAX 
D2 Hell: Tophet and Molech in Hinnom
D3 Hell: The Sermon On The Mount is for You
D4 Hell: Gehenna Fire Judgment   

E.  Hell: Hades and the Second Death











///////



Cortical Visual Impairment - Discovering the world through the eyes of CVI



  

What is CVI?


  According to Dr. Roman-Lantzy, Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI) “is the leading cause of visual impairment in children today”. CVI differs from other types of visual impairment which are due to physical problems with the eyes. CVI is a neurological disorder caused by damage to the visual centers of the brain, which interferes with communication between the brain and the eyes. The eyes are able to see, but the brain is not interpreting what is being seen.

     When a child exhibits one or more visual or behavioral characteristics indicating impairment in his/her visual and/or visual perceptual abilities, a neurologist, ophthalmologist, or other medical specialist may diagnose the child with CVI. The level of severity can range from mild to severe depending on the age of individual at time of insult along with the location and intensity of the damage.    

     CVI is the inability of the brain’s visual systems to consistently process and interpret visual information. CVI is not a disease or a condition of the eye itself or an indicator of cognitive skills. CVI is also known as neurological visual impairment, cerebral visual impairment, delayed visual maturation, or cortical blindness. In North America the condition is described as “cortical visual impairment.” In Europe, the term “cerebral visual impairment" is used.
Causes of CVI:
     There are many conditions that can cause CVI, including anoxic brain damage, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), hypoxic (reduced oxygen to tissue) brain damage found in babies who experience SIDS, but live, individuals who experience a cardiac arrest, individuals resuscitates from drowning, individuals who have experienced extended episodes of epileptic seizures. Other causes include meningitis, encephalitis, head injury, intraventricular hemorrhage, structural brain developmental disorders (such as hydrocephalus, spina bifida, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and microcephaly) and metabolic conditions. Approximately 80% of children with cerebral palsy also have CVI. 

     As more critically ill babies are surviving the incidence of CVI is increasing. This makes it even more important that people know about and understand CVI.
General Characteristics of Individuals with CVI:
  • Normal or minimally abnormal eye exam (CVI may co-exist with optic nerve atrophy, hypoplasia or dysplasia and ROP.)
  • Difficulty with visual novelty (The individual prefers to look at old objects, not new, and lacks visual curiosity.)
  • Visually attends in near space only
  • Difficulties with visual complexity/crowding (Individual performs best when one sensory input is presented at a time, when the surrounding environment lacks clutter, and the object being presented is simple.)
  • Non-purposeful gaze/light gazing behaviors
  • Distinct color preference (Preferences are predominantly red and yellow, but could be any color.)
  • Visual field deficits (It is not so much the severity of the field loss, but where the field loss is located.)Visual latency (The individual's visual responses are slow, often delayed.
  • Attraction to movement, especially rapid movements.
  • Absent or atypical visual reflexive responses (The individual fails to blink at threatening motions.)
  • Atypical visual motor behaviors (Look and touch occur as separate functions, e.g., child looks, turns head away from item, then reaches for it.)
  • Inefficient, highly variable visual sense
  • May also have visual impairments such as optic nerve atrophy, optic nerve dysplasia, strabismus. 
  • Often have no or a poor visual response even in the presence of a normal vision exam and normally functioning pupils. 
  • May have multiple disabilities to include motor and/or cognitive delays, problems communicating and learning language as the result of cerebral palsy, seizures, severe to mild learning disabilities and other neurological problems.
Diagnostic Signs of CVI:  
  • The lack of blinking (atypical visual reflexes).     
  • Staring at lights for an extended period. (light gazing preference).     
  • Tends to turn his or her head to the side when reaching for an object (unable to demonstrate an intact visual guided reach).      
  • A short visual attention span, but may improve if object is moving.     
  • Problems with looking at an object presented at a distance (distance viewing is difficult and   varies at different phases).      
  • Fluctuations in visual functioning throughout the day.     
  • Perceives color—has color preference of usually red or yellow.     
  • Problems with objects presented in some visual fields (visual field preferences may use one peripheral field better or may use central vision).     
  • Fatigues quickly when engaged in visual activities.     
  • Items in parenthesis are key visual behaviors to assess and target in treatment.     
  • Prefers to look at familiar rather than new objects (problems with visual novelty).     
  • Needs extended response time when looking at objects.      
  • Problems looking at objects that are visually complex (difficulties with visual complexity). 
Scoring range for CVI:

Phase I: CVI Range Level 0 to 3 (inconsistent visual attention on objects)
- Need single color or personally preferred color  
 objects.
- Shiny objects.
- Objects with movement .
- Familiar objects.
- Objects presented in a simple background.
- Identify 3-5 objects to use with an individual based on observation and assessment.
- Suggested objects: slinky, reflective pinwheel, windsock, Elmo doll, mobile made out of    silverware.
-  Design activities focusing on the use of these objects for repeated practice in a supportive environment.

If individual demonstrates signs of fatigue (such as yawning, avoiding looking, sleeping, closing eyes, grimacing, yawning, etc.) try:
   - Reducing stimuli.
   - Providing longer periods of visual gazing.
   - Reducing stimuli in setting.

Phase II: CVI Range Level 4 to 7 ( some functional use of vision )
   Use individual’s favorite color and add one or two more colors.
       - Individual should begin to tolerate more complex visual patterns.
   Put reflective strips on objects.
       - Reduction in light gazing by individual
   Use objects from daily routines and activities that are the individual’s preferred color    
   - May also wrap in reflective material.
   - Includes toothbrush, cup, fork, switches,lightbox, etc.
   - Use new objects that are the individual’s preferred color during activities.
   - Place objects on black or plain backgrounds to support the visually guided reach skill.

Phase III: CVI Range Level 7 ½ to 10 ( using vision to perform most activities )
     - Beginning to demonstrate a visually guided reach.
     - Problems continue with complex visual setting.
     - Difficulty with images/words on paper.
     - Problems with objects over 10-15 feet from the individual.
   
Suggested objects: highlighters, simple picture books with outline only, theme based books “my favorite toys”, “foods I like to eat” and others, use photos only of faces initially, can begin to use mirrors, communication symbols of individual’s favorite color, and favorite items with simple backgrounds.
   
Focus on two major skills in this phase:
1) Activities should be designed to support the individual in improving skill in determining how    objects are the same or different using visual features.
   - For example, taking old information or familiar object and relate it to something new but similar as the actual interaction takes place with the new object. (i.e. compare a bus to the family car) 
2) Support the individual to use his or her vision to discern visual details from the background,   visually discriminate within the setting and deal with visually complex objects successfully.
For example:
     Begin with a simple book that uses the individuals favorite color for the main character or object in the story, such as Clifford, the red dog. The activities range from finding a stuffed Clifford, to using a pop-up book about Clifford to visually locating a Clifford dog with movement to finding smaller Cliffords in a “hidden picture” type activity.
Three Important Educational Beliefs:
  1. Children with CVI have the capacity to see more effectively and become more active and fulfilled participants in their school environment.
  2. Improved vision and school participation is dependent on a carefully designed educational program consisting of enjoyable and simplified activities embedded in familiar routines and specific to each child’s unique visual and learning needs.
  3. Effective learning requires that well-trained team members work collaboratively in order to improve vision and learning for children with CVI.
    (Adapted from Edelman, et al., 2006)

    ///////

    Read More:
    http://adifferentperspective.simdif.com

5/28/2013

Food Labeling: How to Identify Conventional, Organic and GMO Produce


Published on Nov 20, 2012 By:KQEDlife
The price look-up (PLU) code system used by most produce distributors has the side benefit of allowing consumers to identify conventional and organic produce at the grocery store. Even though the defeat of Proposition 37 means that genetically engineered information will not be added to labels at this time, PLU codes do have the potential to identify genetically engineered produce. This video shows you how to read PLU codes to unlock the information that is already right at your fingertips. Written and Produced by Mike Kahn.



(Organic Slant) What can you tell from those numbers on fruit and vegetable stickers? The price look-up (PLU) code system used by most produce distributors has the side benefit of allowing consumers to identify conventional and organic produce at the grocery store.
We have all seen cashiers at supermarkets type in the codes from those pesky stickers found on fresh fruits and vegetables, herbs, and sometimes nuts; Perhaps you have even typed the codes in yourself when using the manual checkouts some grocery stores now offer. But have you ever stopped to consider if you should be reading those codes while shopping?
Even though the defeat of Proposition 37 means that genetically engineered information will not be added to labels at this time, PLU codes do have the potential to identify genetically engineered produce. This video shows you how to read PLU codes to unlock the information that is already right at your fingertips.

    Using Price Look-up Codes (PLUs), the Nutshell:
  • PLU codes are four digit numbers that identify different types of produce. For example, #4011 is the code for a standard yellow banana.
  • The number 3 or 4 indicates conventionally grown produce (grown with pesticides, herbicides & fertilizers)
  • The number 9 prefix added to a PLU signifies that an item is organic. For example, #94011 is the code for an organic yellow banana.
  • A number 8 prefix added to a PLU signifies that an item is genetically engineered (GE). For example, #84011 is the code for a genetically engineered yellow banana.
  • PLU codes and their organic prefixes are in wide use but GE codes are rare at best.
The next time you pick up a piece of produce: (1) look at the first digit of the PLU label, (2) remember these numbers, (3) know what you’re buying and then (4) rest assured that they’ll tell you everything you want to know about the food you’re buying for (and serving to) your family.
What I am wondering, is, are these PLU labels safe???? It’s obvious there is some type of glue that attaches them to the fruit, etc.. Even though we tend to all wash our fruits, I still want to know about this glue on the back of the PLU’s!!! I cut out the skin area that the sticker was adhered to.

There is always a catch

Unfortunately, the PLU labelling system is voluntary in Canada and currently there are no Canadian federal regulations specific to PLU stickers or what constitutes a PLU sticker. Rest assured however, that although the use of the sticker may be optional, when a sticker is displayed the information on the sticker must be accurate and truthful. 
Until mandatory food label is a reality, there are clues that will give you hints about the type of produce you are purchasing. So next time before you throw that fruit or vegetable in the cart, peak at the label to be sure you are buying exactly what you are paying for.
This whole GMO labeling debate has grown out of retailers avoiding any type of label indicating GMOs. Look for something specifically labeled “organic” – you won’t have to worry about them hiding the fact an item is organic in some numbered code.
GMO labeling may be as easy as reading the PLU bar code. Many products may already be labeled, if you know where to look!




//////



Retired 4 star Admiral Blows Whistle on Benghazi new Evidence


Published on May 16, 2013 By: stacemart
http://www.politisite.com/2013/01/17/...

THIS ADMINISTRATION SURE APPEARS TO BE FILLED WITH FELONIOUS ,MURDEROUS EVIL TRAITORS .OBVIOUS TO ALL WHO CAN SEE OR HEAR.

A FAST & FURIOUS SUPPOSED KIDNAPPING PLOT WITH A MURDEROUS INTENT

OHHH & THEN THERES THIS BIT FROM A WHILE BACK .REMEMBER "DIZZY HILLARY"

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/...


By Doc Vega
A lot has been said and written, but this promises to break the case wide open!
Ambassador Stevens carried through the streets of Benghazi for 5 hours while US media alleged he was being helped to the hospital? More Obama White House lies!
Ambassador Stevens, beaten, raped, and dragged through the streets of Benghazi for 5 hours clearly not overcome by smoke inhalation, while US media alleged he was being helped to the hospital by the good people of Benghazi? More Obama White House lies!
There have been many theories and accusations about the Benghazi fiasco that not only cost Ambassador J. Christian Stevens his life, but the lives of his staff and one Navy Seal body-guard as well. This action which led to a complete conflagration of terrorist attacks against US diplomatic buildings throughout the Middle East and North Africa still remains largely uninvestigated by the government, unprosecuted by AG Eric Holder’s Depart of Justice, and refuses to bring the guilty parties to justice while many know the truth and are not coming forward. Even though President Obama is implicated in this overseas tragedy still the truth has not emerged.
That has all changed. Finally, an authoritative figure with the proper credentials has stepped up to the plate to tell the true story of what did happen without the lies and cover-ups that have so far kept those guilty of murder from standing trial. The admission on the part of this man will likely blow the Benghazi scandal wide open and lead to arrests if we can get our legal system to act as it should. That, however, is a big if.
The story as it truly unfolded
According to a report from the Washington Times, retired 4 Star Admiral James Lyons reveals the entire plot that led to the deaths of Americans in Libya that could have been prevented, who gave the orders, and why events took place as they tragically did. Admiral James Lyons is probably the highest ranking figure ever to intervene in a federal government criminal case, and testify. Thanks to this man’s dedication to his country and the truth, we will finally know the truth and who was responsible.
In his words Lyons says that the attack on Benghazi was a bungled kidnapping attempt to be perpetrated upon Ambassador Stevens. This was to appear to be a hostage exchange for a terrorist prisoner who was to be released in trade for a supposedly captured US ambassador. The trade would have been for Omar Abdel Rahman an international prisoner, known as the Blind Sheikh.
This apparent abduction by terrorists of our ambassador and then negotiated trade for the Blind Sheikh would have been the “October Surprise” that would have elevated President Obama’s flagging popularity and boosted his approval ratings for a re-election. A dramatic prisoner exchange that saved our ambassador’s life However, something went horribly wrong. A cunning and illegal bit of treachery by the Obama White House turned into something entirely different. Obama’s October surprise turned into a carnage orchestrated by the White House itself as the President, Leon Panetta, and CIA Director, David Petraeus watched via a UAV real-time feed as a 7 hour attack on the Benghazi Embassy raged. Reportedly, stand down orders were given several times to different units within striking distance.
A plot of pure deception
With what should have been only a staged kidnapping of Ambassador J. Christian Stevens, instead, Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty refused a stand down order and began doing their job of protecting the ambassador using force. Immediately the well-trained Seals began inflicting heavy casualties upon the terrorists who thought they were merely in a cake walk to abduct Ambassador Stevens without mishap. As a result of the plan going awry, a massive attack arose from the anger of the terrorists who felt they had been betrayed by President Obama. In the aftermath of the battle which saw Navy Seal Glen Doherty killed after the embassy had been overrun along with the ambassador’s staff. Ambassador Steven’s whose body showed up 5 hours later at a Benghazi hospital supposedly overcome by smoke, but as the initial foreign press reports indicated a much different outcome, in fact, Stevens was raped, tortured, and dragged around Benghazi in retaliation for the botched Obama White House plan.If not for foreign press agents, who were there and saw, we would never have known the truth as the sold out leftist media of the US would have hidden this fact to aid President Obama’s campaign efforts.
Obama hands over Libya to Al Qaeda
Was this just a freak occurrence that belies the true nature of dealings in Libya with American diplomatic efforts, just one glitch in normal standard operating procedure? No, according to former Admiral Lyons and many others such as Glen Beck, who have all uncovered evidence that lead to much more sinister deeds being undertaken. Evidence of a working relationship between the US and its alleged terrorist enemies had already delivered Libya to the Al Qaeda terrorist organization through infiltration of the government, media, and general society prior to the rebellion against Muammar Gaddafi that toppled the dictator last year. That the US has worked with Al Qaeda awarding them security contracts for all US embassies and consulates as well as border protection has instead allowed Libya to become a haven for numerous terrorist operators who have automatic access to Libya’s territory to carry out their training. All this with the support and blessing of the Obama administration. This is not only unthinkable, but beyond excuse or rationalization. There should already be indictments for many in the state department, in the DOJ, all the way up to the oval office, yet, so far nothing has been done.
Treason plain and simple
It goes even farther than that. Evidence indicates that Ambassador Stevens was being used as an arms dealer to supply Jihadists in the region to support yet another uprising in Syria. Just prior to the murder of our ambassador, he was trying to locate guns that had been walked across Libya’s border through Turkey to other countries just as the ATF had done in operation Fast and Furious on the border of Mexico. These are not the actions of inexperience or bad intelligence. They are the actions of traitorous intention. President Obama will, no doubt, be linked to these deaths and operations if Congress will only act, and do its duty in prosecuting a treasonous president who is endangering national security.
There is no where else for a Congressional investigation to turn other than naming the conspirators, determining when officials knew, and assembling the evidence that murder was committed on behalf of the White House to silence those who knew and could testify. Through out the Obama presidency over the last four years the administration has master minded operations that have caused numerous controversies and crises, not to mention the deaths of Americans.
When will the GOP take action?
The Republicans have missed opportunities to discredit the President, to impeach Obama in the wake of waging war against Libya without Congressional approval, and allowed executive privilege to  quash subpoenaed demands for evidence on Fast and Furious never released by AG Eric Holder. John Boehner, Speaker of the House, has refused to exercise initiative whenever the GOP could have used much-needed momentum to stem the tide against the incessant assaults against state’s rights, constitutional rights, and the traditional institutions of America. Will the recent damning evidence now uncovered over the Benghazi fiasco thanks to Admiral James Lyons be implemented to convict the President of potential high treason, or will we see yet another case of criminal acts ignored and hidden at the expense of the American people? If you bother to take interest and act as a responsible citizens contact your congressman and demand action!
Lyons-3-1024x719

Four Star Admiral Is Claiming Obama Conspired With America’s Enemies To Stage Benghazi


(Floyd And Mary Beth Brown)  It’s even worse than we previously thought.

A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election!
The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… that would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.” Although the Obama Administration intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…and the attackers, believing that Obama had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
Some will say that Admiral Lyons’ accusation is not a smoking gun. We agree; that’s exactly why Congress must investigate Benghazi-gate.
Moreover, we firmly believe the problem with Admiral Lyons’ assertion is that he is only scratching the surface; the full and complete truth may be much, much worse.
Benghazi-gate is not about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. It’s not about the Obama Administration’s foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister… something potentially treasonous… and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter:
1.       ”What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?
2.       Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
3.       What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which, as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?
4.       Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
5.       Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
6.       Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?”
It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger operation, an attempt to conceal what The New American calls “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists and self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”
Prior to the election Barack Obama continually told us that “Osama bin-Laden is dead and GM is alive”; but the sad truth is that Osama bin-Laden’s organization is alive and well, and the Obama Regime may be giving aid and comfort to this terrorist network.
And prior to the election, Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera pontificated that Republicans shouldn’t “politicize” Benghazi-gate. Swaggering onto the set of Fox and Friends, Rivera bloviated: “I think we have to stop this politicizing.” And Rivera issued the following veiled warning to Republicans: “Do we want to try and influence the election with a tragedy that happened in North Africa?”
Ironic, isn’t it? Barack Obama played politics with the lives of Americans; like Rivera, the media covered Obama’s rear and threatened to accuse anyone and everyone who mentioned it of “playing politics.”
Weak-willed Republicans apparently took Rivera’s threat to heart as Rivera also said that Republican Senators John Barrasso, James Inhofe, and Bob Corker, who all sit on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “all agree that the supercharged atmosphere around the story — prudence dictates that these hearings be postponed until” after the election.
Well, the election has come and gone. Congress now has no excuse. The American people needed the truth before the election; but now that Obama is back in the White House, real conservatives must demand answers.
The American people deserve to have those questions answered; and moreover, the American people deserve justice.

Obama: "YOU Dishonor Benghazi Victims if YOU Question the Government"

***WARNING! GRAPHIC BEFORE & AFTER PICTURE FOLLOWS!!!***
Ambassador Chris Stevens Before the Islamic
Jihadist attack-
Ambassador Chris Stevens AFTER the Islamic
Jihadist attack-
And, Lastly (for now)-
[ NOTE: This is NOT "Fox News".
I am NOT Brit Hume.
I do NOT plan on being "fair and balanced".
I will report what has actually happened, the facts, and then make honest comments based upon those facts...this is far too important to p****-foot around with "making nice" so as not to offend Obama, Hillary, Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, McCain...or any other Liberal.]  
The pictures above are what actually happened on Sept. 11, 2012.
The day after the Islamic Jihadist attack (jointly planned by Obama and his fellow Islamists to be a "kidnapping" so Obama could "save the day" and win re-election). The plan went awry when real, actual PATRIOTS refused to let a real, actual U.S. AMBASSADOR be kidnapped.  These Patriots weren't let "in" on Obama's treasonous plan...they thought the fires, bombs and gun-fire we're ...well, fires, bombs and gun-fire.
BHO's plan went south quick, fast and in a hurry, see.
And it became a matter of LIE and cover-up.
Before I go any further let link to previous reports on this. This WILL BE as FULL an account as can be made.
And then this-
That's seven links, each with multiple links and sources within them that show that Obama from the start, back in his college days was, and IS, a Muslim and a Marxist. 
They also show the utter loathing and disdain Obama (as ALL Libs/Dems) have for America, Our Constitution, Our Sovereignty, and Our Military.
But now since the investigation has begun in earnest in The Senate we've seen witnesses come forth with damning eye-witness testimony...with even more to come!

Republican expects more Benghazi 'whistle blowers'

[Excerpt.]
McCain called for a select congressional committee with a mandate to interview "everybody," including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who has already testified before Congress on the matter and accepted responsibility for the tragedy.
But McCain's call was brushed off by fellow Republican Representative Darrell Issa, who chairs the House of Representatives Oversight and Government committee that heard from Hicks last week.
"You know, let's not blow things out of proportion. This is a failure, it needs to be investigated. Our committee can investigate," Issa said.
Issa said he would be sending a request on Monday to privately depose two former U.S. officials that headed the Accountability Review Board, which investigated the Benghazi attacks and issued a scathing report on December 18 that criticized security at the mission and leadership "deficiencies".
Issa said he wanted to hear from Thomas Pickering, a former U.S. ambassador in the Middle East, Russia and India, and retired Admiral Michael Mullen, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, privately "so we can get the facts in a nonpartisan way."
========================================================================
BEFORE any of us condemn Senator Darrell Issa, let's remember that the person calling for the "Special Committee" was Liberal, Back-stabber, R.I.N.O. John McCain.
I trust Senator Issa far more than McCain...far, far, FAR more.
While the investigation has just barely started what is Obama doing?
I mean, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is THE President of the United States of America...it should be his Top Priority to fully seek justice...so...what IS Obama doing?
Obama calls Benghazi Investigation a "Political Circus"!
In this Video Obama Really Shows Which Side He is on!


Did you catch that?!
Obama said WE "Dishonor them (the victims of the Benghazi Islamic Jihadist attack) by investigating the government!!! BHO calls it a "political circus" and a "DISHONOR"!!
Now, just WHAT was the REAL reason General Petreaus was fired?

CURL: Watch out for Petraeus in Benghazi scandal  

///////