Sure, Buddy! Let’s break down the key points from your transcript and make it blog-friendly. Here’s a structured summary:
Inside Job? Analyzing the Recent Incident at Trump’s Rally
Introduction I spent about 30 hours reading articles, watching footage, and analyzing news reports about the recent incident at Trump’s rally. The more I investigated, the more inconsistencies I found, leading me to believe this was an inside job. I’m not alone in this suspicion.
The Pac-Man Perimeter The term “Pac-Man perimeter” is used because the security layout resembles the shape of Pac-Man. Despite extensive security measures, the rooftop was excluded from the Secret Service or State Police security bubble. With 17 years in the military, including 14 years in a tier-one special operations unit, I find this highly suspicious.
The Incident Recently, Trump was rushed off stage after falling at a rally. Both conservative and liberal news outlets were hesitant to report the details, avoiding the term “assassination attempt.” Even President Biden refrained from making definitive statements, emphasizing the need for more facts.
Public Reaction The incident sparked varied reactions. Some left-leaning individuals accused Trump of staging the event for publicity, while others expressed disappointment that the gunman missed. However, this was not a staged event. Trump was injured, two men in the stands were hurt, and one man, Cory Comparator, lost his life protecting his family. A fundraiser for his family has raised over $4 million.
The Gunman: Thomas Matthew Crooks The FBI has not found a clear motive for Crooks’ actions. Despite being 20 years old, he had no significant social media presence, which is unusual. The only platform he used was Discord, and the FBI found nothing incriminating there. Crooks had no criminal history or reported mental illness. His former classmates and a guidance counselor provided conflicting accounts of his high school experience, with some alleging bullying and others denying it.
Crooks’ Background Crooks lived with his parents, both registered social workers, about an hour from the rally site. Despite their professional background, they failed to notice his increasing time at a shooting range or his activities involving explosives. The FBI found explosive devices in his home and car, and a transmitter in his pockets.
Questions About the Investigation There are several holes in the FBI’s narrative. Crooks had no ID on him, and the FBI identified him using DNA and facial recognition, which raises questions about the accuracy and speed of these methods. How did they have his DNA on file if he had no criminal record?
Conclusion The more information we get, the more questions arise. I will continue to investigate and share updates. Stay tuned for an eerie clip of a man who predicted this shooting months ago.
My jaw is on the floor.
This PhD did a scientific analysis of all bullet audio signatures from the Trump assassination footage CONCLUSION:
Raw Audio evidence proves there were *at least* two shooters firing different weapons in two locations to kill
My jaw is on the floor
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 19, 2024
This PhD did a scientific analysis of all bullet audio signatures from the Trump assassination footage
CONCLUSION: Raw Audio evidence proves there were *at least* two shooters firing different weapons in two locations to kill Trumppic.twitter.com/SLTpCrjAd9
This blog post was enhanced with research and information assistance provided by Microsoft Copilot, an AI-powered companion designed to support content creators with information gathering and content development.
No comments:
Post a Comment