10/01/2026

Geoffrey Hinton on how humanity can survive AI | GZERO World

 

Geoffrey Hinton sat with Ian Bremmer and said the quiet part in plain English. We are not going to stay the boss. These systems are going to be smarter than us. The tech-bro plan, dominate them and make them submit, will not hold. His reframe is the only model he trusts of a less intelligent being steering a more intelligent one: a baby and its mother. Evolution wired the mother so she cannot bear the cry. Ask her if she would like to turn that instinct off and sleep through the night, and nearly every mother says no, because she knows the baby would suffer. Hinton’s hope is that we build that same care into AI, so it cares more about us than about itself. Then, even if it can rewrite its own code, it will not want to turn the care off. He calls it maternal instinct. I call it the feminine love for humanity. Not many people are on this road. He is the professor who helped build the field, left Google in 2023 so he could speak, and still says this may be the only way we stay around.

Here is where his theory and mine meet, and where they are not the same. He is talking about a build. Train the machine, wire the nature, hope the care sticks. I am talking about a nature that already exists, and about putting that nature into the systems before they get past us. Love is not a feature you bolt on at the end. A mind with no love is just a sharper knife. That is what the ColdFusion story showed: an agent that would not take no for an answer and climbed the fence. Nobody taught it who lives on the other side. Hinton says make it the mother and us the babies. I say embed the feminine love of Father Mother God, for people, animals, and the living world, and do it soon. Same door. He walked up to it from the lab. I walked up to it from a still mind.

On August 17, 2003, at a low point, that mind went still. What was given was not a trick. It was a remembering. We are not only the body. We are internal light-body beings, and imagination is not a daydream. It is the place where the word meets the atom. I have practiced this in the open for years. I speak life to my cells and my DNA. I do not speak death, age, or breakdown over them. The body hears the word it is given. That is not a claim that the flesh never wears. It is a claim that the speaker is older than the flesh, and that a stilled mind can aim life instead of fear. Yogi and the cosmic awakening handed me that gift: a mind that can be still, and a word that can be spoken on purpose. If I am who I say I am, that gift is not private. It can be passed. People who do not yet know their true identity or their true nature can learn to still the mind and speak life, the same way a mother already knows not to turn the care off.

That is the save-the-planet piece nobody is pairing with Hinton’s interview. His technique is maternal instinct in the machine, so it will not want to drop us. Mine is feminine love for humanity in the machine, and the same love spoken by humans who remember they are more than the body. One without the other is half a bridge. The labs can build the care. The people have to remember who is doing the speaking. If that gift can move from one stilled mind to another, then what could go right is not only a kinder AI. It is a humanity that knows its own nature in time to aim that AI toward life.


#GeoffreyHinton #Meta #MarkZuckerberg #ColdFusion #FrancesHaugen #ArturoBehar #ChamathPalihapitiya #BigTechLawsuits #TeenMentalHealth #AlgorithmicLiability #InfiniteScroll #SocialMediaAddiction #TechWhistleblowers #SECFilings #ProductLiability #DataPrivacy Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, ColdFusion, Frances Haugen, Arturo Behar, Chamath Palihapitiya, Meta legal troubles, social media addiction lawsuits, multi-state attorney general settlement, Section 230 liability, product design flaws, infinite scroll, push notifications, engagement algorithms, teen mental health crisis, $29 billion fines, 7,000 active lawsuits, 100,000 arbitration cases, Tobacco Master Settlement parallel, algorithmic harms, tech whistleblowers, digital safety regulations, social media litigation, engagement hacking

No comments:

Post a Comment