Inside the Technocratic Dark State

 

From the neo reactionary accelerationists of the Dark Enlightenment to the AI-spun social credit web of the NEONERDS, today author and researcher Iain Davis takes us on a whirlwind tour of his new book, The Technocratic Dark State.
This video features an interview with author and researcher Iain Davis about his new book, "The Technocratic Dark State" (0:36-1:08). Davis, a UK-based journalist and author, explains his interest in technocracy, which he defines as a distinct ideology based on the rollout of technological controls, rather than communism or fascism (1:40-3:42). He argues that the infrastructure for this system is largely in place, and the current goal is to entice people to use it (3:36-3:47).

Key topics discussed include:

• Neo-reactionaries and the Dark Enlightenment (4:50-5:03): Davis identifies Silicon Valley oligarchs like Peter Thiel, Marc Andreessen, Elon Musk, and Larry Ellison as supporters of the Dark Enlightenment, a philosophy advocating for the privatization of all forms of governance under sovereign multinational corporations. This system would involve individuals surrendering their rights via smart contracts to live in controlled digital city-states (5:05-6:36).
• Accelerationism (6:36-8:42): This is a tactic used by these groups, drawing on Joseph Schumpeter's concept of "creative destruction" (6:55-7:06). They view this as a tool to aggressively invest in "disruptive technology" to destroy old markets and create new ones, thereby gaining sociopolitical power and changing societal structures (7:40-8:42).
• Governance as a Service (9:02-11:59): The concept proposes that individuals would "buy" governance from a sovereign corporation, with centralized authority exerted over a network of "patchwork realms" (10:15-10:20). Davis highlights the deceptive use of libertarian-sounding terms like "decentralization," which ultimately lead to centralized, autocratic control (11:12-11:59).
• Role of AI (17:00-21:31): AI is seen as a "philosopher's stone" by figures like Marc Andreessen, a transformative elixir to end politics and usher in autocratic rule (17:26-18:11). This vision is deeply intertwined with transhumanism, as proponents believe humanity must be transformed into "genetically enhanced cyborgs" to survive an impending technological singularity (19:05-19:38). Davis argues this is based on assumption and deception, as current AI has significant limitations (20:45-21:31).
• Economic Control (21:49-26:59): Peter Thiel's vision for PayPal was to create a new world currency, understanding that monetary control grants total control (22:29-23:07). The launch of Libracoin by Meta (with Thiel on the board) was, according to Davis, a deliberate move to create a "threat" that would necessitate new monetary regulatory environments, leading to acts like the "Genius Act." This act enables privately issued currencies to be distributed globally, a massive shift in the international monetary system (24:05-26:59).
• Life in the Gov Corp State (27:38-31:15): Individuals would have no sovereignty, surrendering all rights and assets into a smart contract structure controlled by the "CEO techno king" of the sovereign state. Daily life would be controlled by AI overseeing digital rights and assets, with policing done by AI robots to eliminate crime. The only "freedom" offered would be the ability to leave, which Davis points out is not feasible for billions of people (27:38-31:15).
• The Way Out: Non-compliance (32:54-37:15): Davis emphasizes that the solution lies in non-compliance. He encourages people to resist the rollout of digital ID, prioritize cash use, minimize digital payment cards, and make it difficult for demanding authorities. He states that if enough people refuse to adopt these systems, they cannot be controlled by them (33:11-37:15).
• Challenging the Illusion (37:54-39:35): Davis refers to these figures as "neonerds," asserting that their power is an illusion. He believes that once people are aware of their plan and understand it, their power diminishes, as there are billions of people who can reject their system. He cites Nick Land's view that opposing their dictats would be considered "semi-criminal proclivities," highlighting their belief in their right to rule (38:13-39:35).
• Importance of Physical Media (40:31-41:26): Davis also touches upon Papercut Publishing House, which published his book, praising its focus on physical media as a necessary counter to increasing digital control, anticipating potential digital channel shutdowns (40:31-41:26).