We Are Watching The Long Game to Total Censorship Play Out

Truthstream Media

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVEaFSr-jdTa_QE4PPSkVJw

Maybe we should just start titling our videos something totally random and innocuous like, "Puppies frolicking in a daisy field" or "Look at this cute cat named Bob!" or "I like cheese"... Thoughts?

Truthstream Can Be Found Here:
Website: http://TruthstreamMedia.com 
FB: http://Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF

Amazon Affiliate Link (help support TSM with every Amazon purchase, no cost to you!):http://amzn.to/2aTARRx
Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*­~*~*~*~*~
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CATEGORY 1: Below is a list of fake, false, or regularly misleading websites that are shared on Facebook and social media. Some of these websites may rely on “outrage” by using distorted headlines and decontextualized or dubious information in order to generate likes, shares, and profits. These websites are categorized with the number 1 next to them.

CATEGORY 2: Some websites on this list may circulate misleading and/or potentially unreliable information, and they are marked with a 2.

CATEGORY 3: Other websites on this list sometimes use clickbait-y headlines and social media descriptions, and they are marked with a 3.

CATEGORY 4: Other sources on this list are purposefully fake with the intent of satire/comedy, which can offer important critical commentary on politics and society, but have the potential to be shared as actual/literal news. I’m including them here, for now, because 1.) they have the potential to perpetuate misinformation based on different audience (mis)interpretations and 2.) to make sure anyone who reads a story by The Onion, for example, understands its purpose. If you think this is unnecessary, please see Literally Unbelievable.

//////